johnb
08-05-2005, 06:28 PM
Your county Chairman is a bigot. You're most visible member in Cary is hateful Alzheimer's patient. The only Democratic Council member in town that you can be proud of with respect to personal integrity lost his seat in the last election cycle.
Let me help. Let's be blunt. The GOP hates me as much as you guys do. Long before Keith Karlsson's troglodytes were slobering over the prospect of him turning them loose to "rip him (me) a new one" the Cary Republicans wanted to string me up by my intestines for ripping into that bunch of country club chumps who were no better than Donkeycrat Lites.
How can I help you?
Well, first, if you want to win elections you gotta pull your collective heads outa your @$$e@. How does Commissar Karlsson inflaming 1/3 of the electorate AGAINST your candidates and handing them campaign materials to beat your candidates up with help? The first rule to winnning elections is STOP LOOSING THEM BECAUSE OF THE STUPID $H!T YOUR PARTY CHAIRMAN IS DOING TO YOUR TEAM.
Second, stop letting the public face of your party be conspiracy minded kooks from the Howard Dean Extreme Team. You are only going to scare the soccer mommys when you start talking about secret underground prisons, secret cabals controlling the US government, and how all those GI's in Iraq are war crimminals. See, the soccer mommies are gonna look at you as if you're a member of the Aluminium Foil Helmet Brigade with a third arm growing out your forehead. Stop it. They don't want their babies blown up by homicide bombers. GWB has won them over because he's having the Islamofascists killed over there and not at Cary Towne Center. Mulder and Scully were characters in a TV show, not successfull candidates for public office.
Third, you have to have an independent thought or idea to win an election. Your party stopped doing tuff like that about 1964. Aside from Clinton, who's independent thought was "What if Eisenhower had Kennedy's libido?", you've not had an important politician with new ideas since Kennedy was voted off the island, and his only new idea was a man on the moon. He may have had only 1 but that was a helluvan idea. Visionary, sweeping, inspiring. Now you twits are nothing but Agnew's "nattering naboobs of negativism." You guys hate and hate and hate. Filibuster, delay, smear, slam. Why no new policy proposals? Why not go on the offensive? When you're playing defense you can only score when the other guy fumbles. THAT's WHY THE GOP KEEPS KICKING YOUR ASSES.
But homeyb, how is that gonnna work for us in Wake County?
Glad you asked. First, fire Karlsson, he and his attack dogs don't know when to shut the h@ll up. Your web page should be free from attacks on voters. The fact that I have to say that is shocking. Second, if your elected officials have to send an email back to party headquarters to figure out how to handle symbolic integrity issues, you have a serious problem. Harold Weinbrecht should be your model. He's direct and honest. Many of us who are not Donkeys or GOP'ers would vote for a guy who is a straight shooter if his opponent isn't. Can't trust a weasal no matter what his party affiliation. If your candidates have to ask permission to stand up and denounce hatred, especially hatred directed against 1/3 of the friggin' electorate, you have a problem people. That response should have been automatic. Of course I stand against hatred based on religion, sex, ethnicity, or nationality Mr Barbara. These remarks are not ones I would ever make under any circumstance and I was unaware that they were on my party's web page. I am going to demand answers and I will get back to you within 48 hours.
See, that disarms the questioner and it puts the politician in a rhetorical 'resting spot' that offends no one. You guys are bush league amatuers, too late now. Curran, et al, have great campaign materials to run with.
Next, don't waste your time trolling for votes among evangelical voters. Your party is hellbent on offending and insulting them. Save your cash for people that might be receptive to your message. As Democratic party gadfly, Stan Norwalk sez: "I resent Evangelicals and tun(e) them out!" That's your public face. Why not just tell them to all go to h@ll and kiss your @ss too? "Oh, and by the way, we'd really appreciate your vote on election day!"
Really? Are you on crack and meth or just meth? Turning people like Norwalk, Karlsson, and the attack dogs loose on Evangelicals is a near 100% sure bet to drive those people into the GOP column. If you want to win elections, see, you have to get more votes than the other guy. You folks start out with your maximum possible vote count being this:
X - Number of registered voters on election day.
Y- Number of Evangelicals registered to vote on election day.
X-Y=L
L- The maximum potential number of votes for a Democratic
candidate.
X= 100 %
Y = 30 %
L = Looser
So homeyb, how does this help me?
It doesn't. You're a Democrat. You're too d@mned arrogant and angry to listen to anyone except people that think exactly like you do. You'll continue to believe you and your party are 'right' on the issues and the problem is you didn't get your message out. Yeah, keep dreaming that snowflake. Your message was received and rejected, get over yourselves.
Or, next election cycle, yell louder at the voters. Call them more names (Republican Ayatollahs!, Christian Fascists!) and insult their integrity and intelligence. That's a winning electoral strategy. It worked for Kerry and Algor didn't it?
Let me help. Let's be blunt. The GOP hates me as much as you guys do. Long before Keith Karlsson's troglodytes were slobering over the prospect of him turning them loose to "rip him (me) a new one" the Cary Republicans wanted to string me up by my intestines for ripping into that bunch of country club chumps who were no better than Donkeycrat Lites.
How can I help you?
Well, first, if you want to win elections you gotta pull your collective heads outa your @$$e@. How does Commissar Karlsson inflaming 1/3 of the electorate AGAINST your candidates and handing them campaign materials to beat your candidates up with help? The first rule to winnning elections is STOP LOOSING THEM BECAUSE OF THE STUPID $H!T YOUR PARTY CHAIRMAN IS DOING TO YOUR TEAM.
Second, stop letting the public face of your party be conspiracy minded kooks from the Howard Dean Extreme Team. You are only going to scare the soccer mommys when you start talking about secret underground prisons, secret cabals controlling the US government, and how all those GI's in Iraq are war crimminals. See, the soccer mommies are gonna look at you as if you're a member of the Aluminium Foil Helmet Brigade with a third arm growing out your forehead. Stop it. They don't want their babies blown up by homicide bombers. GWB has won them over because he's having the Islamofascists killed over there and not at Cary Towne Center. Mulder and Scully were characters in a TV show, not successfull candidates for public office.
Third, you have to have an independent thought or idea to win an election. Your party stopped doing tuff like that about 1964. Aside from Clinton, who's independent thought was "What if Eisenhower had Kennedy's libido?", you've not had an important politician with new ideas since Kennedy was voted off the island, and his only new idea was a man on the moon. He may have had only 1 but that was a helluvan idea. Visionary, sweeping, inspiring. Now you twits are nothing but Agnew's "nattering naboobs of negativism." You guys hate and hate and hate. Filibuster, delay, smear, slam. Why no new policy proposals? Why not go on the offensive? When you're playing defense you can only score when the other guy fumbles. THAT's WHY THE GOP KEEPS KICKING YOUR ASSES.
But homeyb, how is that gonnna work for us in Wake County?
Glad you asked. First, fire Karlsson, he and his attack dogs don't know when to shut the h@ll up. Your web page should be free from attacks on voters. The fact that I have to say that is shocking. Second, if your elected officials have to send an email back to party headquarters to figure out how to handle symbolic integrity issues, you have a serious problem. Harold Weinbrecht should be your model. He's direct and honest. Many of us who are not Donkeys or GOP'ers would vote for a guy who is a straight shooter if his opponent isn't. Can't trust a weasal no matter what his party affiliation. If your candidates have to ask permission to stand up and denounce hatred, especially hatred directed against 1/3 of the friggin' electorate, you have a problem people. That response should have been automatic. Of course I stand against hatred based on religion, sex, ethnicity, or nationality Mr Barbara. These remarks are not ones I would ever make under any circumstance and I was unaware that they were on my party's web page. I am going to demand answers and I will get back to you within 48 hours.
See, that disarms the questioner and it puts the politician in a rhetorical 'resting spot' that offends no one. You guys are bush league amatuers, too late now. Curran, et al, have great campaign materials to run with.
Next, don't waste your time trolling for votes among evangelical voters. Your party is hellbent on offending and insulting them. Save your cash for people that might be receptive to your message. As Democratic party gadfly, Stan Norwalk sez: "I resent Evangelicals and tun(e) them out!" That's your public face. Why not just tell them to all go to h@ll and kiss your @ss too? "Oh, and by the way, we'd really appreciate your vote on election day!"
Really? Are you on crack and meth or just meth? Turning people like Norwalk, Karlsson, and the attack dogs loose on Evangelicals is a near 100% sure bet to drive those people into the GOP column. If you want to win elections, see, you have to get more votes than the other guy. You folks start out with your maximum possible vote count being this:
X - Number of registered voters on election day.
Y- Number of Evangelicals registered to vote on election day.
X-Y=L
L- The maximum potential number of votes for a Democratic
candidate.
X= 100 %
Y = 30 %
L = Looser
So homeyb, how does this help me?
It doesn't. You're a Democrat. You're too d@mned arrogant and angry to listen to anyone except people that think exactly like you do. You'll continue to believe you and your party are 'right' on the issues and the problem is you didn't get your message out. Yeah, keep dreaming that snowflake. Your message was received and rejected, get over yourselves.
Or, next election cycle, yell louder at the voters. Call them more names (Republican Ayatollahs!, Christian Fascists!) and insult their integrity and intelligence. That's a winning electoral strategy. It worked for Kerry and Algor didn't it?