It's all Bush's fault!

[bobo]

Check this out:

http://www.itsallgeorgebushsfault.com/

A little humor from Washington! :lol:

[ChrisD]

On corruption
Posted: Feb 2 2006 06:06 PM

Democrats are hammering Republicans right now for what they call a "culture of corruption." While the Abramoff scandal is no small thing, it is important to realize that he is now on trial for his crimes. He has also been disavowed by all Republicans. Furthermore, those who have been connected with him have lost their power. But when we talk about corruption, let's look at a few facts:

Clinton Democrats:
61 indictments or criminal charges
33 convictions
14 imprisonments
7 independent counsel investigations
72 Congressional witnesses pleading the 5th Amendment
19 foreign witnesses who declined interviews by investigative bodies
17 witnesses fleeing the country to avoid investigation

Bush Republicans
1 indictment, not even on the primary issue

[MattD]

On corruption
Posted: Feb 2 2006 06:06 PM

Democrats are hammering Republicans right now for what they call a "culture of corruption." While the Abramoff scandal is no small thing, it is important to realize that he is now on trial for his crimes. He has also been disavowed by all Republicans. Furthermore, those who have been connected with him have lost their power. But when we talk about corruption, let's look at a few facts:

Clinton Democrats:
61 indictments or criminal charges
33 convictions
14 imprisonments
7 independent counsel investigations
72 Congressional witnesses pleading the 5th Amendment
19 foreign witnesses who declined interviews by investigative bodies
17 witnesses fleeing the country to avoid investigation

Bush Republicans
1 indictment, not even on the primary issue

It's still early in his Administration... right Scooter Libby? Oh, and don't forget about the small matter of Bush violating the 4th Amendment.

[DarylB]

It's still early in his Administration... right Scooter Libby? Oh, and don't forget about the small matter of Bush violating the 4th Amendment.

MattD,

Perhaps you should just say "Thank you", and then write something funny, since this IS the humor page.... then again, your assumptions do make me laugh a little....but just a little....

[bobo]

DarylB's right. This is suppose to be the humor forum. Why don't we pick our favorite from the list of offerings? Here's mine:

Hillary has an open-door policy for female Senators
"I think I left my vibrator at your place last night," said Sen. Feinstein to Hilliary Clinton. :lol:

[Wuptdo]

http://ogresview.mu.nu/images/image001.jpg

Thanks, Ogre.

Wuptdo B-)

[Wuptdo]

What Feminist Dream about! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihpAcNgA0PQ)

8O 8O

[francejamie]

What Feminist Dream about! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihpAcNgA0PQ)

8O 8O

Don't be an idiot. This is just stupid.

You are such a troll.

[Dharma]

What Feminist Dream about! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihpAcNgA0PQ)

8O 8O

Don't be an idiot. This is just stupid.

You are such a troll.

Not just any run-of-the-mill troll but a scary, misogynistic troll who is just begging for ANY kind of attention. Sex offenders have to start somewhere, why not at the computer watching endless hours of Youtube?

Also, what does this have to do with the topic of this thread?

[DarylB]

DarylB's right. This is suppose to be the humor forum. Why don't we pick our favorite from the list of offerings? Here's mine:

Hillary has an open-door policy for female Senators
"I think I left my vibrator at your place last night," said Sen. Feinstein to Hilliary Clinton. :lol:

http://home.mindspring.com/~bakerdl/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/.pond/vibratorraces.jpg.w300h227.jpg

[Wuptdo]

Dharma wrote:

Also, what does this have to do with the topic of this thread?

You need to ask?? Don't you know, everything/anything "bad" that happens in the world is Bush's fault, and now it has even reached "Hollywood." Somehow, someway, GWB/Cheney/Clinton, no doubt through research done by the Rand Corporation, has figure out a new way of population control. That is what you and your friends are always posting about, geez, your the ones with the BDS (http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=%7B6A2ED953-7F19-4A6D-B095-CF59269B817B%7D), be happy. :D

[Caryatid]

Bush Denial Syndrome? No, that's definitely a Republican ailment. My guess is that it'll wear off in about 8 years or so, and you'll see all kinds of guys that currently have chapped lips and brown noses coming out and claiming that they knew Bush was an idiot all along, and that THEY were the voice in the wilderness criticizing him. And I'll bet you fifty bucks that Krauthammer will be among the first.

I think it was about 8 years for that to happen with Nixon. Might happen sooner with Bush.


But hey, this is supposed to be humor, so here's a joke:

Q: What's a moral dilemma for Republicans?

A: Free abortions for illegal immigrants.

[DarylB]

Dharma wrote:

Also, what does this have to do with the topic of this thread?

You need to ask?? Don't you know, everything/anything "bad" that happens in the world is Bush's fault, and now it has even reached "Hollywood." Somehow, someway, GWB/Cheney/Clinton, no doubt through research done by the Rand Corporation, has figure out a new way of population control. That is what you and your friends are always posting about, geez, your the ones with the BDS (http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=%7B6A2ED953-7F19-4A6D-B095-CF59269B817B%7D), be happy. :D

Hey Wup, I think it was all predicted by Nostradamus, and it's simply reiterated in the PNAC document ... It's ALL BUSH'S FAULT :-D
Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -- nay -- the very existence of George W. Bush. See also, Clintonitis, an inflammatory feeling of crawling of the skin and generalised sliminess brought on by the presence of Bill Clinton (not to be confused with similar sounding female anatomical malady)

[Dharma]

Hey Wup, I think it was all predicted by Nostradamus, and it's simply reiterated in the PNAC document ... It's ALL BUSH'S FAULT

Clearly, you've never even looked at the documents as GW Bush is not mentioned anywhere through the 90+ pages or on the webste. This is probably because the major players planned their future long before GW came into the picture.

Project for the New American Century is a neo-conservative think-tank that promotes an ideology of total U.S. world domination through the use of force. The group embraces and disseminates an ideology of faith in force, U.S. supremacy, and rejection of the rule of law in international affairs.

The group's core ideas are expressed in a September 2000 report produced for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, and Lewis Libby entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century. The Sunday Herald referred to the report as a "blueprint for U.S. world domination."

According to the Sonoma State University media research group Project Censored, The Neoconservative Plan for Global Dominance was the Top Censored Media Story of 2002-2003.

PNAC's membership includes people such as Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and William Kristol.

PNAC began to enter the public consciousness when journalist Neil Mackay wrote about the September 2000 report in the September 15th, 2002 edition of the Sunday Herald. According to the article, the report sparked outrage from British Labour MP Tom Dalyell:

Tam Dalyell, the Labour MP, father of the House of Commons and one of the leading rebel voices against war with Iraq, said: 'This is garbage from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam war.

'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing.'

The Sunday Herald article highlighted the following goals from the 2000 report, which it termed an "American grand strategy" and "blueprint of world domination":

***The U.S. must take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein is in power: "While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

***The U.S. must "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core mission"

***The U.S. forces are "the cavalry on the new American frontier"
The report builds upon the 1992 draft document "Defense Planning Guidance," which claimed that the U.S. must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role"

***Permanent U.S. bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, whether or not Saddam Hussein is in power

***Increasing military pressure on China: "it is time to increase the presence of American forces in southeast Asia" which will lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratisation in China"

***"the creation of 'US Space Forces', to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' using the internet against the US"

***The report contains ambivalent language toward bioterrorism and genetic warfare: "New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool"

***Development of "world-wide command-and-control system" to contain dangerous regimes of North Korea, Libya, Syria, and Iran.
Some of PNAC's members and associates have been implicated in conflict of interest scandals involving the ways that they profit from the wars and military spending that they promote. For more information, see Who Profits from War (http://http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/who-profits.html).

Oops. PNAC again. Sorry but YOU brought it up, Daryl. :-s

[DarylB]

Oops. PNAC again. Sorry but YOU brought it up, Daryl. :-s

It was just an inevitable factor of time anyway .... :roll: