Whiny liberal bed-wetters

[ChrisD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help
everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more
riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the
blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our
great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and
establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt
ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths
to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill
of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."

ARTICLE I: ! You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or
any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire
them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This
country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not
just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different
opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always
will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you
stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not
expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives
independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found and will gladly
help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing
generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve
nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional
couch potatoes.

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be
nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested
in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people.
If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be
surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If
you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens,
don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in
a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV
or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want
you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we
expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and
vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American
means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness which, by the way, is
a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic
laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you
are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you
came from!

(lastly....)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history
or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God.
And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any
faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN
GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history and if you are
uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!!!!

[DarylB]

:-D :hello1: :-D :hello1: :-D :hello1: :-D :hello1:

[Wuptdo]

If you are looking for T-shirts for the kids, or something to wear over your bathing suit, or just want your message to be seen, look no farther:

Great T-Shirts & other items (http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingstuff/133386)

Wuptdo B-)

[Wuptdo]

Here is an excellent example of what would happen to our military if liberal, whinny Democrats come back into power:

http://www.thatvideosite.com/video/3969

LwD's want us to become like the French, who they admire so much.

Wuptdo B-)

[francejamie]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help
everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more
riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the
blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our
great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and
establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt
ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths
to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill
of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."


Other than the childish name calling, most of these are just common sense. Of course they are portrayed in a liberal vs conservative in a way to try to exaggerate the liberal positions to the their extremes, and make that look like the norm. These aren't the average liberal positions any more than the average conservative expects everyone to have their own M1 Abhram's Tank, and drive it around shooting everyone who they disagree with.



ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history
or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God.
And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any
faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN
GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history and if you are
uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!!!!
[/quote]

This is BS, however.

The motto IN GOD WE TRUST was placed on United States coins largely because of the increased religious sentiment existing during the Civil War. Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase received many appeals from devout persons throughout the country, urging that the United States recognize the Deity on United States coins.
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/currency/in-god-we-trust.shtml

The fact that "IN GOD WE TRUST" was added to our coins in in 1865 doesn't make it some special thing that must remain forevermore and can never change. It wasn't there before 1865, and it doesn't need to be there now. It was merely added because enough people knew the right people to get it voted on at that time and it passed. There is no sacred reason (yes, I know the irony here) for this to stay.

All this does is give official respect to those religions which believe in "God" in violation of the First Constitution.

Is you belief in God really so fragile, that if you don't see it on the coins, you will lose faith and go astray? This is just part of the ongoing fight of fanatical Christians trying to turn our goverment into a theocracy.

[Jackie]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care.

Chris,

Do you think folks should have the right to purchase health care coverage?

Jackie

[NOtoMYR]

This is just part of the ongoing fight of fanatical Christians trying to turn our goverment into a theocracy.


There's a little green man in my head........

:wink:

Melissa

[dhyatt]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care.

Chris,

Do you think folks should have the right to purchase health care coverage?

Jackie

Jackie,
I've wondered about this because I've heard of cases where individuals were just flat denied coverage - regardless of price - due to pre-existing conditions. I've always found it a bit hard to understand why there wasn't coverage available even if it was at some exorbitant price. In that sense, I believe there is a problem with our current health care system but I'm not sure who's at fault.

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help
everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more
riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the
blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our
great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and
establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt
ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths
to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill
of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."


I'll take each one at a time...

#1 - You assume (and we know what that means!) the author of this is sensible... which you must immediately question when they try to label/blame all the issues on "terminally whiny, guilt riggen, delusional and other liberal bed-wetters".

#2 - Avoid more riots... Did I miss some recent riots?

#3 - Secure the blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our
great-great-great-grandchildren... WE AGREE!! But look at the Republican Party out-of-control recent spending. Remember the bridge to nowhere?

#4 - Name calling. How childish. See again why we question if the author is "sensible".

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE I: ! You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or
any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire
them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This
country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not
just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different
opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always
will be.


I don't disagree with Article I.

Article II: Of course people have a right to be offended, afterall, as Article II states, this country is based on freedom. Also, if someone makes a mockery of my God or my family, of course I can be offended.

If you disagree then you prove the world is full of idiots such as yourself. Fortunately by saying that I know you won't be offended. :wink:

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you
stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not
expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives
independently wealthy.


Yes - to a point. Common sense issues I agree with (a person standing on their tippy toes on the very top of a ladder in a snowstorm... come'on).

However, there are SEVERAL cases were the companies NEED to be held accountable. People had the right to expect their Pinto has safe. Rather then a recall, Ford decided it would be cheaper to settle each death out-of-court (my opinion is Executives should have gone to jail).

People should have expected that silicone gel breast implants were safe.
The 4,000 patients at Durham Hospital should not expect that Hydraulic fluid to be used during surgical instruments.

And SO MANY MORE other cases....

I think we would all agree that the PERSON or COMPANY should be held accountable for their actions.

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found and will gladly
help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing
generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve
nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional
couch potatoes.


50% of people who go on welfare on recently divorced mothers with children.
50% of people on welfare get off within two year.
The three BASIC NEEDS are food, clothing and shelter. We are such a great nation that we have the resources to help people secure these needs.

More NEEDS to be done to get people off welfare and make them more productive citizens. For those who are able, make them "earn" the welfare by putting them in a classroom, pick-up trash, or something productive. Welfare reform is needed... but until then, as a great and wealthy country, we do need to care for those that cannot care for themselves. (call it compassionate conservative)

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights


ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be
nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested
in public health care.


See DonH's response...

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights


ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people.
If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be
surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.


Right, and if not the chair then throw away the key.

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If
you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens,
don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in
a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV
or a life of leisure.


And make sure they can't sell their story so it is shown on a big screen color TV!

[MattD]

Personal Responsibility
The Liberal Bills of Rights

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found and will gladly
help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing
generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve
nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional
couch potatoes.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want
you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we
expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and
vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.


You make the assumption that people who don't have jobs are not educated nor took advantage of opportunities. We all know people, for whatever reason, cannot find work in their profession. Their jobs may have been sent over-seas, downsized, merged or other things beyond their control... and are searching everyday for work. Withouth a job, they may not be able to pay their mortgage, put food on the table or pay their bills. Again, these are people who took full advantage of their oppty.

Also, Article VIII and Article IV don't quite "jive" together.

[Dharma]

Just an FYI:
ChrisD hasn't posted here in over a year. Some whiney, bed wetting liberal probably kidnapped him from The Grover Norquist School of Hate and had him deprogrammed. Now that he's been cured, has his common sense and compassion back, he's posting as FranceJamie. :-D

[Jackie]

Jackie,
I've wondered about this because I've heard of cases where individuals were just flat denied coverage - regardless of price - due to pre-existing conditions. I've always found it a bit hard to understand why there wasn't coverage available even if it was at some exorbitant price. In that sense, I believe there is a problem with our current health care system but I'm not sure who's at fault.

Don,

We found out the hard way that our daughter fit into this category. While going through the process, we contacted various elected officials. David Price's office called us twice. Jim Long's office wrote to us. Several times. Never heard from Sen Dole or then Sen Edwards. Nor the president's office.

In my opinion, Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC should patch the hole, with help from the state. (BCBS provides coverage for children through NC Health Choice, a sliding scale option available to families earning up to 200% of the poverty level. So there's already a relationship.)

Jackie

[Wuptdo]

Having a little fun with the hypocrites at MoveOn.Org:

http://hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/moveonthug.jpg

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/1782/mooonoz2.gif

http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s87/Limerick_share/MoveOn.jpg

The basis of the above is here:

http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2007/09/moveonorgs-thin.html

Wuptdo B-)