PDA

View Full Version : Modern Evil demands a Medieval response



johnb
09-28-2004, 04:33 PM
Occasionally of late various writers have hit the nail squarely on the head. O'Sullivan hits the Europeans, et al, right between the eyes when he writes:

The post-modern world lacks self-confidence and shrinks from using force. It places its trust in treaties and conventions that it enforces only against those who agree in advance to be bound by them.


http://www.suntimes.com/output/osullivan/cst-edt-osul28.html

Modern evil demands medieval response

September 28, 2004

BY JOHN O'SULLIVAN

My back was turned when, to my surprise, I heard my mother's voice on the evening news. I promptly assumed I must have been mistaken: Why would the evening news interview a 92-year-old retired lady from a Liverpool suburb? Of course, my assumption was correct: The network was interviewing an 86-year-old retired lady from a Liverpool suburb -- the widowed mother of Ken Bigley, the British hostage in Iraq.

She was pleading for her son's life.

Ken Bigley is one of more than 100 foreigners who have been taken hostage in Iraq since April. They include Turks, Canadians, Egyptians, Brits and, of course, Americans. Some are truck drivers. Most are civilians -- aid workers, civilian contractors -- of both sexes and of different religions, including Muslims. Nor is nationality a safeguard: Two French journalists are held by terrorists, and French news organizations are pulling their reporters out, despite President Chirac's strong opposition to the Iraq war.

At the last count, 30 such hostages had been murdered -- two Americans last week -- sometimes by the medieval method of beheading. It must be terrible to die alone, far from home, at the hands of brutal bigots, and suffering perhaps minutes of agony before consciousness fails. Yet we know of no one acting cravenly or seeking to join his captors. And at least one hostage behaved with exemplary heroism, trying to tear off his mask and defying the terrorists with the words: "Let me show you how an Italian dies."

In the course of 30 years reporting from foreign countries, I have run into many Ken Bigleys over a drink late at night in a hotel bar after hearing a familiar accent. Some were loners. Others, like Bigley himself, had met and married local women in Thailand or India or Bahrain. But almost all of them were proud that their work was helping poorer people to lift themselves up toward a better life. My impression is that this motive is unusually strong among those in Iraq -- for instance, in the two Italian women aid workers whose fate is still unknown.

Hostage-taking has been a staple tactic of Mideast terrorists since the airline hijackings of the early 1970s. The IRA employed it on both sides of the Irish border. In Latin America kidnapping was started by Marxist terrorists in the 1970s, but since then it has become a profitable commercial business. A hostage is taken every hour in Latin America. The hostage is often a son or daughter of the rich. And the victims are often brutally tortured either to encourage the payment of a ransom or as punishment if it is not paid on time.

Yet 40 years ago hostage-taking seemed a concept from the distant past -- something like slavery and piracy that Victorian imperialists had stopped in their old-fashioned self-righteous way. Like hostage-taking, however, piracy and slavery are making a comeback. Piracy flourishes in parts of southeast Asia, slavery in parts of Africa such as Sudan, and hostage-taking in the Middle East and Latin America.

In general they advance where terrorism has blazed the way by revealing the impotence of law and government when they are not backed by the self-confident application of lawful force. The post-modern world lacks self-confidence and shrinks from using force. It places its trust in treaties and conventions that it enforces only against those who agree in advance to be bound by them. Thus, in the week that its citizens were pleading for their lives in Iraq, the European Union was mainly concerned to prevent Turkey from making adultery a criminal offense -- a droll illustration of "European values."

This high-minded timidity permeates modern culture at high and low levels. For instance, a recent thriller about hostage-taking, "Man on Fire," directed by Tony Scott and based on a novel by A.J. Quinnell, received harsh critical reviews precisely because it seemed to approve of revenge and vigilantism.

Creasy, played by Denzel Washington, is a burnt-out former mercenary who becomes a bodyguard to a young girl in Mexico City. She gradually draws him back from his suicidal despair by her frank affection. When she is kidnapped and apparently murdered, he methodically sets out to find and kill the men responsible -- in very brutal ways. As in the 1970s Charles Bronson movie, "Death Wish," the viewer essentially sympathizes with Creasy. The critics thought this a crudely vicious message on both occasions.

But as Bacon pointed out: "Revenge is a kind of wild justice." It will inevitably -- and arguably rightly -- become the resort of decent people when law and government fail to deliver justice. Post-modern governments fail in just that way. Humanitarian bodies such as Amnesty International are even worse: They practice a sort of unilateral civil libertarianism that holds governments to account for the smallest infraction of civil liberty but treats terrorism as a natural disaster. Transnational bodies like the U.N. and the EU are worse -- they seek to take the weapons of war and capital punishment from us in our struggles against terrorism, slavery, piracy and hostage-taking and to force us to rely instead on their own paper resolutions and elevated principles.

All these responses -- from the critical reactions to "Man on Fire" to the E.U.'s prohibition of capital punishment -- are overcivilized. That sounds almost like a compliment, as if it meant more civilized. In fact, to be overcivilized is to be less civilized because genuine civilization includes a robust willingness to enforce its order and truths on anarchy, violence, murder and superstition.

As long as we remain overcivilized, anarchy, violence, murder and superstition will continue their sinister recovery -- until one day you may think you hear your own mother's voice on the network news.

Wuptdo
09-29-2004, 03:34 PM
JohnB - good post. It is funny for the last several months I have been playing "Medieval Total War!" One of the big problems playing the game is that my conquered "Muslim" countries always revolt (except when taxes are "very low"). I convert them, build them churchs, bars, brothels, and increase food production, and they still "back-stab" me. After I put down the rebellion, I only execute the leaders, as I am benevolent ruler.
However, what I find interesting, is that some things just don't change with time. It is almost like the middle-east is still in the dark ages. Image what the Middle-East would be like without oil?

Wuptdo B-)

johnb
09-30-2004, 12:01 PM
Wup,

When I lived over there in the Black Sea port city of Sinop the Turks would talk to us about the day the Russian fleet sailed into Sinop harbor and sank the Turkish ships. They acted as if it had recently happened and that that was why we were there, to help them in their battle against the Russians. They never seemed to understand we were not there to stand against the "Russians" but against the ideology "communism". Big deviation in expectations.

The problem here was the incident they kept yammering about occured during the Crimean War in the 1850's. They wouldn't let go of it. The Middle East and the Balkans has a problem, they have more history than they can consume locally. They're still fighting the wars not of the last millenium but of the one prior to that even. The Turks have a burning hatred for the Arabs, the Kurds, the Greeks, the Russians, the Serbs, and everyone else in their own neighborhood. And it is completely reciprocal.

The Arabs believe killing Kurds is their national pasttime, second only to killing Jews. These people are clearly tribal in nature and will band together only against what they deem a "greater evil". They all seem to think the "others" next to them are evil, sometimes they ally with the lesser evil against a greater evil, but they still remain evil. Saddam used to repeat an old Sunni proverb: three things God should never have made: a Jew, a Persian, and a Shi'ite.

We should retain the right to decapitate odious regimes that threaten American interests and the world economy. Aside from that let these idiots resume their inter-tribal genocide and continue to slaughter each other the way they've been doing it since time began. To hell with them, as long as they confine their mayhem to remain within the borders of the Islamic world, put it on pay for view so the rest of us can laugh along with the hilarity of it all. When an economically viable alternative to oil is available they will be no different than most of sub-Saharan Africa: a wasteland of ignorance and barbarism the rest of the world avoids since there is nothing of political, economic, military, artistic, or cultural importance produced there currently. Their best days passed centuries ago. Since they refuse to adapt to modernity, they reject the concepts of the rule of law and the inherent rights and dignity of individual human beings the next South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, or Hong Kong will not arise from that area. They will produce more Somalias, more Pakistans and more Sudans. That is their greatest contribution to the modern world. Mayhem, "religious" violence, political instability, repression, barbarism, and death are the fruits they will harvest since that's all they sow.